Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Supreme Court Directs Reconsideration of Minneapolis Officer Lawsuit in Protest Shooting

It orders the appeals court to apply a broader reasonableness standard from a recent ruling when reassessing Bauer’s use of force.

Ethan Marks, left, and Soren Stevenson, right, were shot in the face by Minneapolis police with non-lethal projectiles in the wake of George Floyd's death in police custody on May 25. Each has filed a lawsuit against the city of Minneapolis and unidentified police officers.
Image
Image

Overview

  • On May 27, the Supreme Court vacated the 8th Circuit’s split ruling that had allowed Ethan Marks’s lawsuit to proceed, remanding the case under the Barnes v. Felix precedent.
  • Marks was 19 when Officer Benjamin Bauer fired a 40 mm less-lethal projectile at close range during a 2020 protest, leaving him legally blind in one eye.
  • The Barnes v. Felix decision permits courts to evaluate police use of force by examining the broader context rather than only the immediate moment of injury.
  • In its initial 8th Circuit decision, two judges ruled Marks posed no threat when struck by the projectile, deeming the force unreasonable; a third judge dissented, pointing to the chaotic protest environment.
  • Marks’s attorney anticipates the lawsuit will proceed again; the Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association expects a reconsideration to result in its dismissal.