Overview

• The Supreme Court heard arguments regarding Donald Trump's assertion of presidential immunity for actions taken during his presidency.
• Legal experts express concerns that the court's decision could establish a dangerous precedent, potentially delaying the trial until after the presidential election.
• Trump's legal team argues for absolute immunity for official acts, while opponents deem such claims as a path to dictatorship.
• Justice questions during the hearing suggest skepticism about granting complete immunity to presidents for actions taken while in office.
• The outcome of the Supreme Court's decision remains uncertain, with implications for the upcoming presidential election and the rule of law in the U.S.