Overview
- A bench of Justices M. M. Sundresh and K. Vinod Chandran dismissed the direct plea under Article 32 and granted liberty to approach the Patna High Court.
- The petition sought to annul the Bodh Gaya Temple Act, 1949, on grounds that it violates Articles 25, 26 and 29 by entrusting a Hindu-majority committee with temple management.
- Under the Act, a nine-member committee with eight state nominees, four of whom must be Hindu, governs the UNESCO World Heritage site.
- Petitioners argued that mismanagement by the Bodh Gaya Temple Management Committee has endangered the sacred Bodhi Tree.
- The Supreme Court’s procedural ruling leaves the high court to determine the merits of exclusive Buddhist control and the Act’s constitutionality.