Supreme Court Declines Appeal from Inmate Kept in Solitary Confinement for Three Years
Justices Jackson, Sotomayor, and Kagan Dissent, Highlighting Dismal Conditions of Confinement
- The Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal from Illinois inmate Michael Johnson, who was kept in solitary confinement for three years without any opportunity to exercise.
- Johnson's lawyers argued that the deprivation of yard time, in the absence of a true security justification, violated the Constitution’s bar on cruel and inhumane punishment.
- Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, dissented from the court’s decision, highlighting the dismal conditions of Johnson's confinement.
- Johnson, who has been diagnosed with severe mental health conditions, saw his mental state deteriorate rapidly during his time in solitary confinement.
- The Illinois Department of Corrections justified the harsh treatment due to Johnson's continuous misconduct, including assaulting correctional officers and other inmates.