Overview
- In a unanimous 9-0 decision on June 5, the Supreme Court ruled the 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act prevents Mexico from holding U.S. manufacturers liable for cartel violence.
- The court held that to overcome the PLCAA’s immunity, a plaintiff must plausibly allege a gunmaker knowingly violated a state or federal statute in sale or marketing, which Mexico’s complaint did not.
- Mexico filed its suit in 2021 against Smith & Wesson, Glock, Beretta and others, seeking roughly $10 billion in damages and court-ordered safety measures for U.S.-made firearms.
- Gun rights advocates hailed the ruling as a victory for industry protections, while gun control groups and several state attorneys general had backed Mexico’s bid to challenge the immunity shield.
- The Supreme Court vacated the 1st Circuit’s revival of the case and remanded it with instructions reflecting that Congress, not the courts, must amend liability rules for firearm makers.