Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Supreme Court Admits Challenges to Two TEPJF Magistrate Appointments

The court must rule by August 31 on civil society’s standing to contest the magistrate appointments under the electoral appeals law.

- La Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación (SCJN) admitió una segunda impugnación en contra de la elección de Claudia Valle Aguilasocho y Gilberto de Guzmán Bátiz García como magistrados del Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación (TEPJF). Foto: SCJN
Archivo - La mujer del presidente del Gobierno, Begoña Gómez, a 13 de noviembre de 2024, en Madrid (España).
Image
Una vista ante el Tribunal de Justicia de la UE (TJUE) en la Gran Sala.

Overview

  • The SCJN admitted two appeals against the election of Gilberto de Guzmán Bátiz García and Claudia Valle Aguilasocho as Sala Superior magistrates.
  • President Norma Lucía Piña Hernández routed the later appeal to Minister Alberto Pérez Dayán and the earlier one to Minister Jorge Mario Pardo Rebolledo.
  • Both appeals were brought by non-candidates—civil society representative Gabriela Lorena Sterling Ávalos and ex-aspirant Iván Bravo Olivas—despite the LGSMIE limiting challenges to unsuccessful nominees.
  • Complainants argue the INE violated constitutional and LGSMIME provisions by forwarding the impugnations to the TEPJF instead of directly to the Supreme Court.
  • Draft resolutions are in preparation and must be finalized before the court’s summer recess to meet the August 31 deadline ahead of the new magistrates’ September 1 Senate oath.