Particle.news

STJ Postpones Ruling That Could Define Brazil’s Fracking Rules

The relator asked for more time to revise his draft vote, leaving unsettled whether courts may suspend auctions and contracts before national studies or regulation exist.

Overview

  • The Superior Tribunal de Justiça paused the IAC 21 proceeding when rapporteur Minister Afrânio Vilela took the case back to revise his draft after hearing oral arguments and colleagues’ observations.
  • Vilela told the court he plans to return the case at the next session for repetitive appeals, so no minister has yet voted and the panel has not reached a decision.
  • The Ministério Público Federal asks the STJ to suspend the 2013 contracts and future bidding for five Parana Basin blocks until technical-scientific studies, a sedimentary-area environmental assessment (AAAS) and national regulation are completed.
  • The ANP, the federal government, Petrobras and industry representatives argued at the hearing that bidding, research and production are separate stages and that a judicial ban on auctions would preempt technical review and exceed judicial authority.
  • The dispute began with the ANP’s 2013 12th Round, a 2017 federal-court annulment that invoked the precautionary principle, and a 2019 TRF-3 reversal; the eventual STJ ruling could set a national precedent affecting contract stability, regulatory power and local environmental risk.