Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Sting Faces High Court Dispute Over Police Streaming Royalties at London Hearing

The case turns on whether arranger shares from decades-old band agreements extend to digital income from streaming services.

Overview

  • Andy Summers and Stewart Copeland sued in late 2024, alleging they are owed more than $2 million in unpaid streaming-related arranger fees.
  • Sting’s lawyer, Robert Howe, told the High Court that $800,000 has been paid for admitted historical underpayments since the case began.
  • About $1.2 million remains contested, with the court asked to decide how to allocate digital revenue under old contracts.
  • The band’s arrangements were set orally in 1977, put in writing in 1981, and reaffirmed in 2016 without explicit reference to streaming.
  • Sting’s side argues the agreements concern mechanical royalties tied to physical formats, while Summers and Copeland say they cover streaming and downloads; Judge Robert Graham Bright oversaw the preliminary hearing, and no trial date is set.