Overview
- Relator Dias Toffoli proposed textual changes and a 60‑day adaptation period during plenary debate on June 10–11, and the session was suspended with several votes still outstanding.
- The court’s framework keeps extrajudicial notices as a route to remove content and replaces absolute immunity with a rebuttable presumption of fault that platforms can overcome by showing diligent action.
- The STF singled out categories that trigger faster removal duties, including acts antidemocratic, terrorism, child sexual exploitation, inducement to suicide, discrimination, and trafficking in persons.
- Toffoli and other ministers narrowed some obligations by exempting small or noncommercial ‘neutral’ providers from full duties, limiting the duty of care to large services and debating the need for in‑country representatives.
- The ruling already shapes policy: May 2026 presidential decrees mirror the court’s approach, and stakeholders warn the rules could force faster takedowns, prompt new transparency reporting, and reshape moderation during election cycles.