Particle.news
Download on the App Store

States, Cities, and Unions Sue to Block Trump Education Rule Narrowing Public Service Loan Forgiveness

Plaintiffs argue the Education Department exceeded its authority by letting the secretary brand employers as having a 'substantial illegal purpose,' seeking to stop the policy before it starts in 2026.

Overview

  • Two lawsuits were filed in federal court in Boston: one by 21 states and Washington, D.C., and another by a coalition of cities, unions, and nonprofits represented by Democracy Forward and Protect Borrowers.
  • The final rule, issued last week, revises which employers qualify for PSLF by allowing disqualification of organizations found to have a 'substantial illegal purpose,' with examples including aiding illegal immigration, supporting terrorism, or providing certain gender-affirming care to minors.
  • The policy is scheduled to take effect July 1, 2026, and plaintiffs seek a declaration that it is unlawful along with injunctions to block implementation and enforcement.
  • The Education Department, through Under Secretary Nicholas Kent, defends the change as a neutral, commonsense anti‑fraud measure and says it will enforce the standard without regard to ideology or mission.
  • Plaintiffs warn of chilled public-service employment and program instability; PSLF has already canceled debts for more than 1 million borrowers, and the department estimates fewer than 10 employer removals a year under the rule.