Overview
- At a Comodoro Py hearing, new defense lawyer Mauricio D’Alessandro argued the recordings are false, AI‑edited and not Spagnuolo’s voice, and sought total annulment of the case.
- Federal prosecutor Franco Picardi urged rejection of nullity, asserting the audios were not used as probative grounds to open the inquiry and that there is no evidence of illegal espionage.
- The Sala II panel—Roberto Boico, Martín Irurzun and Eduardo Farah—heard arguments and is positioned to rule on the nullity challenges.
- Judge Sebastián Casanello and Picardi previously ordered raids at ANDIS, private homes and Suizo Argentina, seizing phones and documents, while DATIP reported deletions and WhatsApp restoration attempts on Spagnuolo’s device.
- The case file remains under judicial secrecy with forensic analyses pending and its lifting expected soon, as Suizo Argentina’s owners also seek nullity citing a related 2024 desestimación.