SEC Says Arbitration Clauses Won’t Block IPO Acceleration, Ends Automatic Stays on Challenges
The agency will focus on disclosure adequacy, with enforceability left to state law.
Overview
- The SEC’s new policy states staff will not deny or delay acceleration solely because a registrant’s governing documents require investor claims to be arbitrated.
- Amendments to Rule 431 remove automatic stays when staff acceleration decisions are challenged, limiting post-effectiveness disruption to offerings.
- Relying on Supreme Court precedent, the Commission concluded federal securities statutes do not displace the Federal Arbitration Act’s policy favoring enforcement of arbitration agreements.
- The SEC did not endorse the merits of mandatory arbitration and took no position on enforceability, noting that state corporate law, including Delaware’s new Section 115(c), may restrict such clauses.
- Commissioner Caroline Crenshaw dissented, warning of harms to retail investors from private arbitration and criticizing the lack of public comment.