Scientific American Endorses Kamala Harris for President
The magazine's second-ever presidential endorsement sparks controversy over the politicization of science.
- Scientific American endorsed Kamala Harris, marking only the second presidential endorsement in its 179-year history.
- The magazine highlighted Harris's positions on healthcare, climate change, reproductive rights, and technology as reasons for their endorsement.
- Critics argue that such endorsements undermine public trust in scientific publications and contribute to political polarization.
- A study cited by multiple sources suggests that previous endorsements by scientific journals have led to reduced trust in those publications among opposing political supporters.
- Prominent voices in the scientific and journalistic communities have expressed concern over the potential damage to Scientific American's credibility and reputation.