Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Rosenkrantz Rebuts Bias Claims, Reaffirms Supreme Court Impartiality

He says trial judges control the pace of sensitive cases, noting persistent vacancies as a concern.

Overview

  • He rejected a newspaper article’s claim that he or the Supreme Court targets corruption cases, calling the suggestion false.
  • He stressed that the duty of impartiality bars a justice from expressing preferences about the progress or outcome of ongoing cases.
  • He clarified that the timing of proceedings involving Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, including Cuadernos, Hotesur and the Iran Memorandum, is set by trial judges and the superior courts overseeing them.
  • He voiced concern about vacancies on the bench, as the Court operates with three members and broader staffing gaps weigh on the judiciary’s functioning.
  • Reporting details 359 vacant posts across national and federal courts, with 204 shortlists awaiting Executive submission to Congress, vacancy rates near 33% and rising, no new judicial or prosecutorial appointments under the Milei government, and open seats used as negotiating leverage between the Executive and Congress.