Overview
- In a public statement on December 28, Supreme Court Justice Carlos Rosenkrantz rejected a media report that alleged targeted intervention in specific cases.
- He asserted that his judicial work does not follow political agendas or objectives aimed at particular files.
- Rosenkrantz described impartiality as a cardinal virtue that prevents judges from signaling preferences on the progress or outcome of ongoing proceedings.
- He clarified that current corruption-related matters do not depend on Supreme Court decisions at this stage, citing proceedings involving Cristina Fernández de Kirchner.
- He expressed concern about vacancies that have left the Court with a reduced bench, noting the strain this places on its functioning.