Overview

• Prince Harry personally attended a two-day appeal hearing in London, contesting the reduction of his state-funded police protection after stepping back from royal duties in 2020.
• His legal team argued that the risk assessment process by the UK Interior Ministry and RAVEC was flawed, citing extremist threats and his military background as factors necessitating higher security.
• Harry claims he has been subjected to discriminatory treatment compared to other royals and emphasized the risks to his family during UK visits.
• The Interior Ministry defended its decision, asserting that Harry receives tailored security measures appropriate to his circumstances as a non-working royal.
• The court has concluded the hearings, with the final decision expected to be delivered in writing after further deliberation, likely after Easter.