Overview

• Prince Harry appeared at London's Court of Appeal to challenge the UK's 2020 decision to downgrade his taxpayer-funded security after stepping back from royal duties.
• His legal team argued that the 'bespoke' security arrangement unfairly singled him out for inferior treatment and failed to follow established risk assessment protocols.
• Cited threats include an al-Qaeda assassination call and a 2023 paparazzi car pursuit in New York, underscoring his concerns over personal and family safety.
• The UK government defended its decision, claiming the bespoke approach offers flexibility and is tailored to actual circumstances, given his changed status as a non-working royal.
• The two-day hearing concluded with some sessions held privately due to sensitive security details, and a written ruling will be issued at a later date.