Overview

• PRI senators said they will vote against the proposal, branding it a peligroso retroceso and dubbing it the Ley del Desamparo.
• PRI and PAN leaders argue the changes would shift the amparo from protecting citizens to shielding the State, citing risks to healthcare and environmental defenses.
• PAN deputy Federico Döring warned that rulings could go unfulfilled by invoking material impossibility, such as a lack of budget for medicines.
• UNAM constitutional experts said the plan is largely regressive, noting tighter limits on suspensions, weaker enforcement of judgments, and a tilt toward executive power.
• Experts highlighted specific provisions including fines levied on agencies instead of officials and the denial of provisional suspension against UIF bank-account freezes, while noting digitalization of amparo as a limited positive.