Particle.news

Philippine House Panel Rejects Impeachment Complaints Against Marcos

A pro-administration majority in the lower house makes an impeachment referral to the Senate unlikely.

Activists hold placards, flags and a banner during a protest calling for the impeachment of Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. as a Philippine house panel weighs in on the merits of the complaints, outside the House of Representatives in Quezon City, Philippines, February 4, 2026. REUTERS/Lisa Marie David
FILE - Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte speaks during the 90th anniversary of the office of the vice president on Friday, Nov. 14, 2025, at a hotel in Makati, Philippines. (AP Photo/Aaron Favila, file)
FILE - Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., waves during his keynote speech at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) CEO summit in Gyeongju, South Korea, Friday, Oct. 31, 2025. (AP Photo/Ng Han Guan, File)
Philippines President Ferdinand Marcos Jr attends the 27th ASEAN-China Summit at the National Convention Centre in Vientiane, Laos, October 10, 2024. REUTERS/Athit Perawongmetha/File Photo

Overview

  • The House justice committee voted overwhelmingly that two complaints against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. lacked sufficient substance.
  • The filings accused Marcos of corruption tied to alleged 'ghost' flood-control projects and of enabling Rodrigo Duterte’s arrest for possible transfer to the International Criminal Court, with one also citing unproven drug-use claims.
  • Committee vice chair Ysabel Zamora said the complaints failed to show any overt act by the president directing the alleged schemes, and another lawmaker said no specific role was established.
  • A plenary vote is expected to determine whether to uphold or override the panel’s findings, and impeachment would require support from at least one-third of the House before proceeding to a Senate trial.
  • Opposition figures, including Makabayan bloc lawmaker Sarah Elago, criticized the decision as an effort to block accountability, as public scrutiny over flood-control spending continues.