Overview
- Caleb Williams produced a four-touchdown, 334-yard performance in Chicago’s Week 1 win yet received an overall PFF grade that ranked him roughly 20th among quarterbacks based on human play-by-play evaluation.
- PFF and Cris Collinsworth defended the grade by saying graders penalized a wiped-out end-zone interception as a -1.5 because the underlying decision was poor, and they also cited a sack with an open check-down, a delay-of-game and several overthrows.
- PFF’s descriptive human grade conflicted with the company’s other measures, which rated Williams highly by showing 0.55 EPA per play and a quarterback-impact ranking near the top, highlighting a gap between subjective grades and box-score metrics.
- Collinsworth acknowledged fans’ frustration and said he understands the reaction, while PFF removed on-screen player scores from Sunday Night Football introductions and provided on-air explanation of its process.
- The debate spotlights how PFF’s consumer-facing product uses human judgment about ball placement and decision-making, a tension intensified after the company sold its B2B data business to Teamworks and cut portions of its content team.