Overview
- The Supreme Court’s constitutional and social chamber declared the fishing industry’s popular action unfounded, closing a multi‑year case.
- The ruling ratifies the May 30, 2024 decision by Lima’s Second Constitutional Chamber and confirms that Sernanp’s 2021 directive restates prohibitions already in the 2001 regulation.
- Judges rejected arguments about irregular publication and alleged violations of legal certainty raised by the Sociedad Nacional de Pesquería.
- The judgment is final and unappealable, with formal notification pending, consolidating Sernanp’s enforcement authority across all protected areas.
- The court specified that allowances in the Dorsal de Nasca reserve are case‑specific and do not authorize industrial fishing across Peru’s protected areas.