Overview
- The majority held that prosecutors violated the principle of legality by constructing a non-existent criminal type and by treating a political party as a criminal organization.
- The decision says the accusation did not identify illicit origin of campaign funds and improperly extended the money-laundering offense to political financing that became criminalized only in 2019.
- Dissenting justices argued the tribunal overstepped into ordinary criminal jurisdiction and disputed any violation of the reasonable-time guarantee.
- The Public Prosecutor’s Office filed a second accusation on July 2, 2025, reducing some counts and seeking 35 years in prison for Keiko Fujimori.
- The yearslong process—marked by 19 returns of the accusation and three imprisonments—has fueled opposing commentary, with some calling the ruling a correction and others, including former TC head Marianella Ledesma, calling it unequal treatment and a clash with Supreme Court criteria.