Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Op-Ed Cites Supreme Court Precedent to Defend Faculty Speech After Kirk Assassination

An Inside Higher Ed essay argues universities are violating First Amendment obligations by punishing faculty posts about Charlie Kirk’s killing.

Overview

  • The author describes a nationwide wave of firings and suspensions tied to social media commentary about Charlie Kirk’s death.
  • He argues public-university employees’ posts are often protected under Rankin v. McPherson and the Pickering balancing framework.
  • The piece contends institutions are reacting to organized pressure and doxing campaigns led by conservative activists and politicians.
  • He warns of a chilling effect on academic freedom as administrators make hasty decisions based on online outrage.
  • The author predicts many terminations will be overturned through litigation that could impose significant costs on universities, noting he advises a Turning Point USA chapter despite ideological differences.