Ohio Supreme Court Rules 'Boneless' Wings Can Legally Contain Bones
Controversial decision denies compensation to injured diner, sparking legal and public backlash.
- The ruling states that 'boneless wings' label refers to cooking style, not the absence of bones.
- A 4-3 decision by the court dismissed a lawsuit from a man who suffered severe injuries from a bone in 'boneless' wings.
- Dissenting justices criticized the majority opinion as illogical and contrary to common sense.
- The decision has raised concerns about broader implications for food labeling and consumer expectations.
- Upcoming elections could impact the court's composition and future rulings on significant issues.