Ohio Supreme Court Rules 'Boneless' Wings Can Contain Bones

The court's 4-3 decision emphasizes that 'boneless' describes a cooking style, not a guarantee of no bones.

• Michael Berkheimer sued after a bone in a 'boneless' wing caused severe medical issues.
• The majority opinion stated that consumers should expect bones in chicken dishes.
• Dissenting justices argued that the term 'boneless' implies the absence of bones.
• The ruling supports lower courts' decisions that 'boneless' is not a literal promise.
• The decision may have broader implications for food labeling and consumer expectations.

21 Articles

Morning Brew OutKick USA TODAY Above the Law BBC Business Insider Breitbart One America News Network CNN The Hill People South China Morning Post The Daily Caller Reason.com Washington Examiner Dexerto New York Post Associated Press Cleveland Plain Dealer The Kansas City Star The Columbus Dispatch