Ohio Republicans Face Backlash Over Misleading Ballot Language on Redistricting
Controversial wording could misinform voters about anti-gerrymandering amendment ahead of November vote
- The proposed language describes the amendment as partisan and misleadingly suggests it limits voter rights.
- Civil rights groups and former officials argue the language violates constitutional requirements for clarity and fairness.
- Supporters of the amendment plan to challenge the wording in the Ohio Supreme Court.
- The amendment seeks to establish a 15-person citizen commission to ensure fair districting.
- Previous anti-gerrymandering reforms were ignored, leading to heavily skewed districts favoring Republicans.