Overview
- The Ninth Circuit Court ruled 7-4 to uphold California's ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds, citing historical precedents in firearm regulation.
- Judge Lawrence VanDyke issued an 18-minute YouTube video dissent, arguing the majority's decision was based on a flawed understanding of firearms and their practical use in self-defense.
- VanDyke's video included demonstrations with firearms, which his colleagues criticized as improper and akin to self-appointing as an expert witness without procedural safeguards.
- The court majority emphasized that large-capacity magazines are not protected under the Second Amendment and highlighted their role in exacerbating mass shootings.
- Legal experts described VanDyke's video dissent as unprecedented, with some speculating it could be an attempt to gain attention for a potential Supreme Court nomination.