Particle.news

Download on the App Store

New Ruling Tightens Bank Liability as AI-Driven Robocalls and Phishing Emails Escalate

Banks may refuse reimbursements for customers deemed grossly negligent under the Oldenburg decision, prompting a focus on prevention tools among consumers, carriers, anti-spam services

Die Verbraucherzentrale rät, solche Mails unbeantwortet in den Spam-Ordner zu verschieben. (Symbolbild)
Urteil: Phishing-Opfer bleibt auf Schaden sitzen
Image

Overview

  • The Oberlandesgericht Oldenburg held that banks can deny refunds when customers share credentials through gross negligence, leaving phishing victims responsible for losses
  • Fraudsters deploy AI-enhanced robocalls that spoof numbers, clone voices and analyze simple replies to verify active lines for sale or follow-up scams
  • Targeted phishing emails impersonating ING, Consorsbank, Spotify and Deutsche Telekom use urgent, time-limited threats and generic greetings to trick users into disclosing login details
  • Community-driven anti-spam platforms such as CleverDialer and Tellows logged record spam volumes in July and publish flagged numbers to help users block recurring scams
  • Consumer advisers urge sign-ups on no-call registries, installation of verification apps, official-channel checks for any request and avoidance of brief verbal affirmations