Overview
- On Jan. 16, Myanmar’s agent Ko Ko Hlaing told ICJ judges that Gambia has not met the burden of proof and that the 2016–2017 “clearance operations” were counter-terrorism, not genocide.
- Myanmar’s legal team questioned the reliability of U.N. fact‑finding reports and argued the Genocide Convention requires the highest standard of proof, citing a threshold of beyond a reasonable doubt.
- Gambia’s counsel presented accounts of mass killings, sexual violence and village burnings, asserting that dehumanizing rhetoric by officials evidences genocidal intent.
- Judges will hear closed‑door testimony from Rohingya survivors during the ongoing merits hearings, which are scheduled to continue through Jan. 29 in The Hague.
- The 2017 military campaign forced more than 700,000 Rohingya into Bangladesh, and analysts note the ICJ outcome could influence other genocide cases, including South Africa’s application concerning Israel.