MPs Remove High Court Oversight from Assisted Dying Bill
The controversial decision replaces judicial approval with a proposed expert panel, raising concerns over safeguards for vulnerable individuals.
- The committee overseeing the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill voted 15 to 7 to eliminate the requirement for High Court judges to approve assisted dying applications.
- The judicial safeguard, previously hailed as a critical protection, would be replaced by a three-member panel comprising a lawyer, a psychiatrist, and a social worker.
- Proponents argue the panel offers a more patient-centered approach with diverse expertise, while critics claim it weakens protections and creates an unaccountable system.
- Concerns have been raised about the panel's lack of direct patient interaction and the potential for it to function as a rubber-stamping body.
- The bill will return to the House of Commons for further debate and a vote, likely in late April, with some MPs reconsidering their support due to the removal of judicial oversight.