MPs Criticize New Office for Value for Money as Ineffective and Redundant
A Treasury Committee report questions the purpose, staffing, and oversight of the newly established Office for Value for Money, launched to improve government spending efficiency.
- The Treasury Select Committee has labeled the Office for Value for Money (OVM) as poorly defined, understaffed, and lacking a clear plan to measure its effectiveness.
- The OVM, introduced in October's budget by Chancellor Rachel Reeves, aims to ensure efficient public spending but faces criticism for potential duplication of existing government efforts.
- David Goldstone, the OVM's chair, is contracted for only one year, working one day per week at a rate of £950, raising concerns about the unit's capacity to achieve meaningful results.
- The committee highlighted that the OVM currently has only 12 full-time staff, falling short of the promised 20, and lacks transparency on its operational costs and use of consultants.
- MPs have called on the Treasury to clarify the OVM's goals, publish details on its collaboration with other departments, and establish methods to evaluate its effectiveness.