Overview
- Morena released the raw questionnaires and survey results used to pick 17 state coordinators and held a press briefing with seven external pollsters who ran identical 'mirror' surveys to replicate the measurements.
- The party said the mirror polls matched Morena’s findings and that most aspirants accepted the designations after the disclosure, a claim made public on Tuesday during the party presentation.
- Selections were decided by a weighted scoring system that awarded up to 10 points across eight variables such as positive opinion (2 points), willingness to vote (2 points), and coalition preference (3 points), which meant small percentage differences in answers could decide outcomes.
- Disputes arose over transparency and results, with the Partido del Trabajo protesting and skipping several presentations, while Morena set up technical review committees in Baja California Sur, Zacatecas and Nayarit to respond to challenges.
- Parity and coalition adjustments changed at least one outcome: although Héctor Santana topped the raw score in Nayarit, the coordination went to Jasmine Bugarín to comply with the party’s gender‑parity rules, illustrating how methodology and rules altered raw popularity.