Particle.news
Download on the App Store

MoonLake Investors Urged to Seek Lead Role in Securities Suit as Dec. 15 Deadline Nears

Plaintiff firms cite allegations that MoonLake overstated sonelokimab's edge over BIMZELX following Phase 3 results that rattled investors.

Overview

  • The putative class action, Peters v. MoonLake Immunotherapeutics (No. 25-cv-08612, S.D.N.Y.), alleges violations of Exchange Act §§10(b) and 20(a) and SEC Rule 10b-5.
  • The complaint targets purchases of MLTX between March 10, 2024 and September 29, 2025, with motions to be lead plaintiff due December 15, 2025.
  • Filings claim MoonLake misled investors by promoting SLK’s Nanobody design as superior to monoclonal antibodies without a reasonable basis.
  • Allegations include that SLK and BIMZELX both target IL-17A/IL-17F and that purported tissue-penetration benefits would not deliver superior clinical efficacy.
  • MoonLake’s September 28, 2025 Phase 3 VELA update reported noncompetitive efficacy versus BIMZELX, and the stock fell about 90% to $6.24 the next trading day, prompting multiple firms—including Robbins Geller, Rosen, DJS, Frank R. Cruz, and Faruqi—to solicit class members.