Montana Judge Overturns Law Defining Sex as Only Male or Female
The ruling cites the law's vague title, which failed to clarify whether 'sex' referred to gender or sexual intercourse.
- Judge Shane Vannatta ruled the bill's title did not clearly state its purpose, violating the Montana Constitution.
- The law defined 'male' and 'female' based on chromosomes and gamete production, excluding intersex and transgender individuals.
- Plaintiffs argued the law denied legal recognition and protections for gender-nonconforming people.
- The judge emphasized that the ruling was based on the technicality of the bill's title, not on the broader issue of transgender rights.
- The American Civil Liberties Union of Montana celebrated the decision as a safeguard for legislative transparency.