Particle.news

Download on the App Store

MIT Preprint Links ChatGPT Use to ‘Cognitive Debt’ and Draws Scrutiny

The study’s preliminary EEG findings have prompted proposals for AI literacy programs alongside demands for peer-reviewed validation.

To ChatGPT or not to ChatGPT? Recent research struck a chord with educators struggling with widespread AI use to write essays
Image
A recent viral study suggested that students who use ChatGPT to write essays engage in less critical thinking

Overview

  • Researchers at MIT’s Media Lab measured brain activity in 54 adults and found those using ChatGPT for essays exhibited lower neural connectivity and recall compared with search engine and brain-only groups.
  • A fourth session swapping tools showed participants who started with ChatGPT maintained reduced cognitive engagement even when writing without AI, hinting at possible lasting effects.
  • Lead author Nataliya Kosmyna cautions that only 18 participants completed the final session and notes the paper remains an unreviewed preprint requiring further testing.
  • University instructors describe ChatGPT-generated essays as “soulless” and report widespread student reliance, prompting calls for AI literacy curricula and revised examination formats.
  • Neuroscientist Ashley Juavinett and other critics argue the small sample size and study design lack sufficient methodological rigour and urge larger, peer-reviewed investigations.