Minnesota Supreme Court Weighs Legislative Quorum Dispute

The court considers whether to intervene in a partisan deadlock over House control, with Democrats and Republicans clashing on quorum rules.

The Minnesota Supreme Court is reviewing whether a quorum in the House requires 68 members, as Democrats argue, or 67, as Republicans contend.
Democrats have boycotted the legislative session to prevent Republicans, who hold a temporary one-seat majority, from advancing their agenda without a power-sharing agreement.
The dispute stems from a November election tie, later disrupted by a residency ruling disqualifying a Democratic winner, leaving a 67-66 GOP majority until a March special election.
Democrats demand assurances that Rep. Brad Tabke, who narrowly won reelection and was confirmed by a judge, will be seated, while Republicans have refused to commit.
The court's decision, expected soon, could determine whether legislative business can proceed or if a power-sharing arrangement must be reinstated.