Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Milan Review Court Says No Corruption Pact Proven in Catella Case

The published reasons stress the absence of the quid pro quo required to sustain a corruption charge.

Overview

  • In motivations filed on September 26, the Tribunale del Riesame explained why it annulled Manfredi Catella’s house arrest on August 22 for lack of serious indications.
  • The judges said chats and emails showed frequent, at times improper, familiarity between private actors and municipal figures but contained no signals of a corrupt agreement.
  • The €28,000 invoice flagged by the gip was deemed tied to actual work performed by architect Alessandro Scandurra for Coima, with no evidence of false billing.
  • The court noted there were no direct contacts recorded between Catella and Scandurra, and it emphasized that utility alone does not prove the required quid pro quo.
  • The panel highlighted that the Landscape Commission had 11 members with no evidence of undue pressure from Scandurra, as the wider Milan urban-planning probe continues with over 70 people under inquiry including Mayor Giuseppe Sala.