Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Miami Jury Weighs Tesla Autopilot Liability in 2019 Fatal Crash

Judge’s approval for punitive damages raises the stakes as jurors assess claims of missing crash data and system design shortcomings.

Image
Lawsuits against Tesla have “made a big difference,” said a lawyer for Banner’s widow.
Elon Musk beim Besuch des Bundeskanzlers in der Tesla Gigafactory Berlin-Brandenburg
in Grünheide / 220322

*** Chancellor of Germany visits Tesla Gigafactory, Gruenheide, Germany - 22 Mar 2022 ***
Naibel Benavides Leon and her boyfriend Dillon Angulo. She was killed in the crash and he was left severely injured

Overview

  • A Tesla engineer testified that the company did not maintain Autopilot crash records before March 2018, leaving gaps in the system’s safety data.
  • Safety expert Mary Cummings told jurors that critical Autopilot warnings are difficult to access and that Tesla did not implement geo-fencing to prevent system misuse.
  • Plaintiffs presented vehicle logs demonstrating that Autopilot detected a parked Tahoe but failed to issue a warning or apply automatic braking.
  • Tesla’s lawyers argued that driver George McGee’s distraction and manual override of the system, not a technological defect, caused the April 2019 collision.
  • Judge Beth Bloom’s approval for plaintiffs to seek punitive damages significantly increases Tesla’s financial exposure as jurors deliberate liability and safety standards.