Overview
- The Court invalidated reforms that allowed Quintana Roo’s specialized anti‑corruption prosecutors to petition judges directly for wiretaps and live mobile geolocation.
- Ministers anchored the decision in Article 16’s privacy protections and Article 291 of the National Code of Criminal Procedure, rejecting dispersion of intrusive investigative powers.
- The ruling reiterates that requests for interception and real‑time tracking must be centralized in the head of each state Fiscalía rather than delegated to specialized units.
- The session featured tense exchanges, with Minister María Estela Ríos González opposing the project and Minister Yasmín Esquivel advancing a narrower view that deference to national rules could validate certain local provisions.
- The decision strengthens legal uniformity on surveillance techniques and sets a binding criterion likely to guide reviews of similar state statutes.