Megyn Kelly and Dan Abrams Clash Over Trump Verdict
Debate ignites over the justification of Trump's conviction for falsifying business records.
- Trump was found guilty on 34 counts related to a hush money payment to Stormy Daniels.
- Kelly argued the payment was not immoral and criticized the trial as biased.
- Abrams insisted the payment was a campaign finance violation and thus illegal.
- The debate highlighted differing views on the legality and morality of Trump's actions.
- Kelly and Abrams had a heated exchange on the implications of the verdict.