Particle.news

Download on the App Store

McGregor Drops Fresh-Evidence Request as Court Examines Jury Directions and Right-to-Silence

Judges will determine if mislabelling sexual assault as assault or citing no-comment interview answers unfairly influenced the civil verdict.

Image
Image
Image
Image

Overview

  • His legal team withdrew attempts to admit neighbour affidavits suggesting Hand’s bruising came from a domestic incident hours after the alleged hotel assault.
  • One appeal ground argues Judge Alexander Owens wrongly directed the jury to assess “assault” instead of “sexual assault.”
  • McGregor contests that relying on his “no comment” responses during garda interviews allowed jurors to draw improper adverse inferences.
  • Hand’s counsel has requested that the court refer the withdrawn neighbour statements to the Director of Public Prosecutions for further review.
  • Proceedings continue before Justices Kennedy, O’Moore and MacGrath as they consider whether these procedural issues warrant overturning the verdict.