Overview
- On August 5, four McGill faculty associations representing more than 500 academics filed a judicial review in Quebec Superior Court seeking to invalidate Bill 89, marking the first major legal test of the law.
- Bill 89, adopted May 29, gives the labour minister broad authority to restrict strikes deemed harmful to the public.
- The challenge invokes the Supreme Court’s 2015 Saskatchewan Federation of Labour ruling, which recognized the right to strike as an irreducible minimum of freedom of association.
- Faculty warn that empowered service-requirement mandates during disputes could erode universities’ academic independence.
- They contend that removing strike leverage tilts collective bargaining in favour of employers by stripping workers of their primary negotiating tool.