Overview
- Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg asserts Trump's actions were unofficial and not protected by presidential immunity.
- Prosecutors highlight that the evidence in question is minimal and does not impact the overwhelming proof of guilt.
- Trump's defense claims that the trial was tainted by evidence related to his official acts while in office.
- Legal experts believe the Supreme Court's ruling complicates but does not invalidate the Manhattan convictions.
- Judge Juan Merchan to rule on the immunity issue before Trump's September sentencing.