Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Major Law Firms Push Back on Trump’s Pro Bono Demands

Firms assert independence in client selection as Democratic investigations into Trump’s executive orders intensify.

Image
The office of the law firm Perkins Coie is seen on April 10 in Washington, DC.
People march during the LULAC Dallas Mega March for a bipartisan immigration reform to the Dallas City Hall in Dallas on March 30.
Image

Overview

  • Several prominent law firms have publicly reaffirmed their autonomy in choosing pro bono clients, countering claims of compliance with Trump administration directives.
  • Nine firms, including Latham & Watkins and Simpson Thacher, pledged nearly $1 billion in pro bono work but maintain the administration cannot dictate their client or matter selection.
  • Democratic lawmakers, led by Rep. Jamie Raskin and Sen. Richard Blumenthal, are investigating potential violations of federal laws, including bribery and racketeering, linked to Trump’s coercive executive orders.
  • A federal judge recently struck down one of Trump’s executive orders targeting Perkins Coie, declaring it unconstitutional and an attack on legal independence.
  • Law school students and institutions are boycotting firms perceived as capitulating to Trump, further straining the reputations of the affected firms.