Overview
- Environmental Working Group accused the final MAHA report of mirroring pesticide industry language and dropping earlier talk of restricting specific chemicals.
- Stat News reported the strategy centers on funding research, precision application technologies and public education that boosts trust in EPA reviews rather than proposing bans such as on glyphosate.
- Harvard public health experts said the plan overlooks leading child health threats like firearm injuries, poverty, systemic racism, sugar‑sweetened beverages and lead in water.
- Gizmodo highlighted MAHA activists’ anger at a Republican spending‑bill provision reported by the New York Times that could limit liability for companies such as Bayer.
- The Daily Signal published a commentary defending MAHA’s emphasis on research, transparency and consumer education as a preferable path to new regulation.