Overview

• Justice N. Senthilkumar heard the catering company’s application seeking to restrain Joy Crizildaa from disparaging the unregistered ‘Madhampatty Pakashala’ mark and then reserved orders.
• The company alleged contract cancellations totaling about ₹11.27–12 crore followed Crizildaa’s posts, a causation claim the judge probed and Crizildaa’s counsel disputed.
• Crizildaa’s side argued she never targeted the firm’s commercial activities or urged clients to avoid it, saying she is pursuing justice related to her personal claims and pregnancy.
• Separately, Madhampatty T. Rangaraj filed a personal suit to protect his personality rights, seeking to restrain allegedly defamatory content and to remove Instagram posts dated July 26, July 30, August 19, and August 30, 2025, with detagging.
• The court noted Rangaraj’s personality‑rights application was not yet numbered and would be taken up next week, and no interim deletion orders or final relief have been granted.