Madras High Court Rejects Interim Bid to Block Joy Crizildaa From Tagging 'Madhampatty Pakashala' Online
The ruling concerns interim relief only, with the broader case to be decided at a later hearing.
Overview
- Justice N. Senthilkumar dismissed the catering company’s plea seeking to restrain Joy Crizildaa from tagging or hashtagging its unregistered brand in social media posts.
- The court’s order leaves the company’s requests for deletion of posts, damages, and other restraints to be argued in the pending civil suit.
- The case is scheduled to resume on December 8, 2025, following Tuesday’s refusal to grant the emergency injunction.
- The plaintiff alleges reputational harm and canceled contracts, citing losses of about Rs. 12 crore within 15 days linked to Crizildaa’s posts.
- Crizildaa maintains her posts address a personal dispute with director Madhampatty Rangaraj and denies urging any commercial action against the company.