Overview
- Justices J. Nisha Banu and S. Srimathy delivered opposing opinions on six petitions challenging animal sacrifice and the hill’s renaming.
- Justice Banu refused to ban sacrifices at the Sikandar Badhusha Dargah, citing its status as an established practice in both Hindu and Muslim traditions.
- Justice Srimathy found no conclusive proof of historical sacrifice at the dargah and directed its trustees to seek validation in a civil court.
- Both judges upheld the name Thirupparankundram Hill and barred quarrying as well as new infrastructure that could damage its protected monuments.
- The case has been referred for a tie-breaker verdict and the Archaeological Survey of India must survey and demarcate the hill’s heritage structures within one year.