Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Macrons to Present Photographic and Scientific Evidence in U.S. Defamation Case Against Candace Owens

Their lawyer says expert testimony will seek to establish falsity under the U.S. actual malice standard.

Overview

  • Attorney Tom Clare told the BBC the court submission will include scientific expert testimony and, where admissible, photographs such as pregnancy and family images.
  • The couple filed a 218-page defamation complaint in Delaware on July 23 seeking unspecified compensatory and punitive damages.
  • Candace Owens has moved to dismiss on venue grounds, arguing the case should not proceed in Delaware and that defending it there would cause substantial financial and operational burdens.
  • Because the plaintiffs are public figures, the suit must show actual malice, requiring proof Owens knew the statements were false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth.
  • The U.S. case follows repeated online assertions traceable to a 2021 YouTube video; a separate French defamation win in 2024 was overturned on appeal in 2025 and remains under challenge.