Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Macrons Pursue 219-Page Defamation Lawsuit as Owens Repeats Conspiracy Claims

Their robust complaint backed by Clare Locke lays out evidence to refute Owens’s conspiracy theories, setting the stage for a crucial test of the actual malice standard.

Image
Image
Image

Overview

  • On July 23, Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron sued Candace Owens for defamation in Delaware Superior Court, alleging her podcast claims about the first lady’s identity and incest are baseless.
  • The complaint, handled by libel specialists at Clare Locke, includes photographs, Brigitte Macron’s birth announcement and voting records to demonstrate that Owens’s allegations are false.
  • Despite facing potential massive damages, Owens has aired at least four additional podcast episodes reiterating her unfounded conspiracy theories.
  • The lawsuit will hinge on proving actual malice under U.S. law for foreign public figures and may set new precedents for political misinformation liability.
  • Owens’s claims have exposed divisions within the MAGA movement and raised concerns over potential strains in U.S.–French diplomatic relations.